Monday, January 3, 2011
The Sophistication of Scams
I just got done reading the article Scams achieve a new level of sophistication which does a good job at pointing out that anyone can become the victim of a scam. Here are my two cents that I added as a comment to the article . . .
These scams have been evolving for years now, and the WORST part about any of the counterfeit cashier's check scams is the fact that when someone wants to find out if the check is legitimate and they take it to the bank for them to look at . . . because of course the average person would assume the bank can spot a counterfeit check . . . the banking customer is told that it is "good", "clear", "verified" and that "funds are available". Look up good, clear and verified in the dictionary and by definition the average person would then assume that there is no problem in cashing and using the money from a check that is "good", "clear" and "verified". But this is where we as banking customers make a mistake . . . we trust our banks are giving us accurate information.
These checks can come back weeks and even months later as counterfeit, and the bank CUSTOMER is held liable for the entire amount, the the bank, who verbally told us it was "good", "clear" and "verified".
How about the banks start telling people the truth? That it could take 10 business days or more for the check to be "good", "clear" and "verified". Is that too much to ask?
Saturday, October 16, 2010
Eight years . . .
Sunday, October 3, 2010
Nigerian Cheque Fraudsters - Continued
By James Bigglesworth
INTERVIEW WITH THE VICTIM - (PART ONE)
I interviewed the potential victim over a number of days during the compilation of this article. Below is part one of our interview, which covers the initial part of the scam.
Quote:
CyberCrimeOps.COM: Hello Pat, thanks for coming to talk to us.
Pat: Hi James, glad to be here and thanks for allowing this story to to be told via your forum. I hope that many people will read and learn from it.
CyberCrimeOps.COM: You are quite welcome. Let's start with some basics; Who are you and what do you d for a living?
Pat: Sure, I'm Pat [censored], forty something guy from the Manchester area of our fair land of England. I'm a Vetinary Surgeon and have a small animals practice in [censored] that has been around since my grandfathers days.
CyberCrimeOps.COM: Great, thanks for that Pat. Tell us how you came into contact with the Nigerian fraudster.
Pat: Well, our surgery isn't doing so great, so I was in need of a quick way of earning some extra cash. I know I should not have done it, but I actually responded to a spam email in my account. It was the only one I have ever answered, and by heck the only one I ever will. I didn't actually expect to get a reply, but I did.
CyberCrimeOps.COM: What was the original email all about?
Pat: To be honest it was a bit vague, which I suppose piqued my interest. The subject was "Program employment for all", but the email address that it came from was curious "employment_deaf_govemployment_d@yahoo.co.jp". The email was very short but said it was for helping unemployed people in their free time. I guess it was cheeky of me to reply, since I have a full-time job, but I was curious. That's when this "Samuel Morcas" responded to me.
Readers may be interested to learn that the same email solicitation was received by ourselves and is posted in our Hall Of Shame forum.
CyberCrimeOps.COM: What did you find out from the reply?
Pat: Sam got back to me on the 8th June 2009, day after I first replied to him. He said that he was from New Jersey, but now in Nigeria, and that he was looking for someone to help him distribute his payroll cheques.
CyberCrimeOps.COM: Did he say how you were to do that?
Pat: Eventually, though his initial reply asked me if I have a good printer. I replied again saying I did, and basically asked him to tell me what he wanted.
CyberCrimeOps.COM: Did you get any further details when he got back to you?
Pat: Yes I sure did. Basically he wanted me to purchase some computer software which he called "verser check", and to buy paper and ink for printing of the cheques. Then he would send me a list of people to send cheques to. I would print out the cheques at home, using the special software, and send them out to the people he gave me.
CyberCrimeOps.COM: So, why do you think he couldn't do that himself?
Pat: Actually I never did ask him that, I just assumed that because he was in Nigeria it would take too long for the postal mail to get to the UK. If he was paying payroll, he wouldn't want to keep people waiting for their pay too long. He did also say that he would set up a FedEx or DHL account for me to get the cheques delivered, which I guess would be very expensive to use from Africa.
CyberCrimeOps.COM: Did you start to suspect anything was wrong with the offer?
Pat: Well yes and no really. I knew that I was talking to a spammer, but I really didn't think much about it. Looking back I was an idiot, and actually gave him my full name and postal address.
CyberCrimeOps.COM: Hindsight is a wonderful thing Pat. What happened next?
Pat: I was curious about the software he talked about so went on Google to see what I could find out. I managed to locate software called "VersaCheck" and the Ink he talked about called "VersaInk". It was American, so I wrote back and told him that it wasn't available for the UK.
The Ink is designated as Magnetic Ink Character Recognition which is used on cheques for compliance with US Federal and Canada Bank regulations.
CyberCrimeOps.COM: What did he say to that?
Pat: He seemed to accept it, and said he would send me the cheques in the postal mail. The last communication I had with him was on June 18th, 2009, about a week and a half after his original spam email.
CyberCrimeOps.COM: When did the cheques arrive?
Pat: Actually they didn't arrive, and I began to forget about it.
PRINTING AND DISTRIBUTING CHEQUES
If some unknown individual offers you some form of employment and asks you to print cheques for distribution, there is only one thing to do.
WALK AWAY!
It is accepted that a business will print their own cheques for the purpose of payroll. This seems to be what these scammers are hooking into for their illegal activities. If you are recruited online to participate in such a scheme you can guarantee that it is 100% illegal.
The abuse of payroll cheque printing appears to be centered around the USA. It is also quite common for US based cheque fraud to involve charities, or at least a stolen version of their cheques. This abuse is simply down to the Federal Laws written so badly in the USA that the Banks are protected. This protection makes the Banks act like gods, and the attitudes mean that victims of crime get the blame for what is in reality failure by the banks to protect their own customers.
I find that banks in the USA always blame the customer, and never accept any responsibility for a bad system. They won't fix it, because they are protected by Federal law, so why should they. Changing the law is the only way to change the lax and hugely arrogant banking attitudes, and we all know how quickly that is going to happen.
References and Further Reading
Hall Of Shame - Program employment for all
Wikipedia - Curiosity Killed The Cat
Wikipedia - Magnetic Ink Character Recognition
Related CyberCrimeOps.COM Articles
Cheque Fraud - The Unseen Victims
Overpayment Scams
Payment Cashing - A Mule Of A Fraud
Secret and Mystery Shopping With A Twist
Seller Beware - Are You Really Getting Paid?
You Have Won A Lottery/Sweepstake - Or Have You?
Friday, October 1, 2010
Nigerian Cheque Fraudsters
Nigerian Cheque Fraudsters - Truth From The Horses Mouth
By James Bigglesworth
July 9, 2009
INTRODUCTION
Some people reading this article may have heard about "The Nigerian Cheque Scam", where someone from Nigeria sends a cheque for more than the value of something that is being offered by a seller. Likewise, cheques to be "processed" as part of some employment scheme are also included in this bracket. The premise is to get the victim to cash the cheque, and send part of the proceeds somewhere else. Later the cheque bounces, leaving the victim with a large debt to pay, and possible prosecution.
The cheques are not always sent from Nigeria though. They may actually be sent from somewhere within your own country, maybe even your own state, province or county. It could be confusing to be dealing with someone who says they are an American in Nigeria, but you are in Britain, and you get a cheque post-marked London.
Ever wondered how this is done? What goes on beneath the surface? Read on to find out more.
DO NOT TRY THIS AT HOME
The compilation of exchanges below have been provided to us by a potential victim of a fraud. The communications, though not totally complete, have taken place between an innocent and a Nigerian criminal. Readers are reminded that communications with criminals is hazardous to your status as a living member of society. Giving personal details to a fraudster places you, your family and your friends, in the firing line if a scammer wants retribution against you.
Whilst it is not always easy to know that person x is a fraudster before you start to communicate, anything that follows that indicates that they are a criminal should be enough to cease any further communication.
There is a saying that "Curiosity Killed The Cat" [link], and this is a warning for everyone to take heed. Our potential victim was so curious that he could very easily have been mistaken for a willing participant of an international bank fraud.
In short, DO NOT attempt to "find out what it is all about", simply walk away and do not look back.
Tuesday, September 21, 2010
Scams and Trying to Educate People
To find out a check’s status, call your bank twice (talk to two different workers in case one doesn't understand the process) to verify that the check has been fully processed. Otherwise you lose the money if the check is a fake.
Thursday, August 26, 2010
Victims - Tell your story!
I will OFTEN get requests from media people for victims to share their story (on radio, tv or in print). If you are a victim who would be willing to share your story, please contact me via email with your name, state you live in, and the type of scam you were a victim of (counterfeit check, romance, roommate, credit card fraud, 419, ID theft, etc.)
This can be a wonderful way for you to share your story and help to warn and educate other people about scams!
You can also find me at http://www.retaggr.com/page/ShawnMosch
Saturday, July 10, 2010
Consumer Law & Policy Blog sees my point
I think this is wrong. When the bank employee tells you that the check is "clear", "good" or "verified" that should be the same as a verbal contract, and if something should come up later with that same check the BANK should hold some, if not all, of the liability. Isn't that the job of the bank, to verify these checks?
This is why we have started the petition at http://www.change.org/petitions/view/create_scam_education_and_awareness_programs asking for a change in these laws and better consumer protection against theses scams. We have also gone out to local high schools to give presentations to the students in order to educate them about these scams, and the banking terms. We need to give not only our teens, but everyone, the tools that they need to protect themselves from these scams.
Shawn Mosch
Co-Founder of ScamVictimsUnited.com
There is strength in numbers!
Find us on Twitter, Facebook and more through http://www.retaggr.com/page/ShawnMosch
Support Scam Victims United by shopping at http://shopittous.blogspot.com/
Sign our petition for Scam Education and Awareness Programs http://www.change.org/petitions/view/create_scam_education_and_awareness_programs
Wednesday, June 2, 2010
Counterfeit checks and MoneyGram
Do not post your contact info here . . . if you do not already have my contact information, you can find me through http://www.retaggr.com/page/ShawnMosch
Friday, April 23, 2010
Scam Victims arrested - adding insult to injury
Most people know the saying "Innocent until proven guilty" but the scam victims that I have spoken with that have been arrested would say that they were seen as guilty until they could prove they were innocent. Why is this? Over the years some businesses and banking institutions have gotten better at detecting a counterfeit cashier's check or money order, but instead of warning the customer that the item is a counterfeit and that they are involved in a scam, they instead call the police into the matter and press criminal charges against the customer. These businesses and financial institutions will charge that the customer was aware that the document was counterfeit and that they were trying to defraud them . . . basically, that they were in on the scam. Most times the customer is truly an innocent person who really believed that the cashier's check sent to them was good, or was only going to the bank to ask them to verify it and then before they know it then end up in handcuffs in a police department.
If you find yourself in this situation you need to read the document "The At Risk of Arrest and Arrested Fraud Victim Manual" This document will cover you and your relationship with law enforcement, your attorney, how to write a narrative of what happened to you, as well as defining some of the legal terms that you will hear so that you know better what to expect.
One of the really important things that this document says is that if you are a fraud/scam victim and you feel you are at risk of being arrested, keep a copy of this manual with you at all times. If something happens, you can refer to this document so that you don't panic and say or do something that will make your situation worse. NEVER wave you Miranda Rights.
While we were never arrested in our case, I do understand the feeling of panic of becoming a scam victim. My first thoughts were "Who do I call? Where do I report this?" That is exactly why we have the Resources page on our site. When you feel like your world has been turned upside-down and you don't know what to do, write up one letter that includes all of the information on what happened . . . names, dates, who said what and when . . . and then send that one letter to all of the agencies listed at our Resource Page. We also have information on banking terms on this page along with other helpful tips like
- Close any other accounts that you have at that bank so they cannot freeze those accounts
- Turn off any direct deposits you have going into that account
- Turn off any automatic payments or withdrawals you have coming out of that account
- Open an account at another bank
Friday, April 9, 2010
No, you didn't win the Pepsi Lottery
This is to inform you that your e-mail has won you a total sum of £950,000.00 GBP (NINE HUNDRED & FIFTY THOUSAND POUNDS) in the Pepsi lottery of 2010. To claim your prize Contact Shaw Hendrick at: shawhendrick-pepsi@admin.in.thFirst, you have to enter a contest/lottery/sweepstakes in order to win. Second, I am going to guess if there was a Pepsi Lottery going on, they would have ads EVERWHERE telling people about it. Third, if this person really worked for Pepsi, they would have an official Pepsi Company email address.
Name:
Address:
Mobile No:
Age:
Sex:
Occupation:
Country:
NOTE: ALL REPLIES MUST BE ADDRESSED TO Shaw Hendrick: shawhendrick-pepsi@admin.in.th
Judith Hodge
Public Announcer
So how does this scam play out? I am going to guess that you will either be asked for your bank account information so that they can directly deposit your winnings, but instead will take everything from your account. The other option is that they will send you a cashier's check for your winnings, and you will have to send a portion of that check back to them (maybe to cover legal fees for your winnings) but the problem will come AFTER you wire them the money and the bank calls you to tell you that the check is counterfeit and they now want you to pay them back. You cannot just wait for the check to "clear" or be "verified" because even if the bank told you it was "clear" it can come back as counterfeit a week later . . . I know . . . that is what our former back told us!
For more information on Lottery Scams check out our website or talk with others on our message board.
Tuesday, February 16, 2010
Wire Transfers and scams
Did you know this . . . when you wire money to someone, even if you write on the documentation that the wire transfer is to be picked up in Detroit, Michigan if the scammer has the test/security question and answer along with the wire transfer information then they can pick up the money at any location in the world . . . like Lagos, Nigeria.
These test or security questions are a feature put in place for emergency situations, when the person picking up the money has lost their photo id, which is normally needed to pick up a wire transfer. But if you give the scammer the test/security question information that is how they bypass the need for a picture id when picking up the money. This happens every day on sites like Craigslist. The scammer will pretend to be within the United States so as to not raise any red flags with the potential victim by mentioning that they are really in Nigeria.
With so many scams using wire transfering services like Western Union and MoneyGram we at Scam Victims United would like to see these companies increase their security by making it mandatory that the money must be picked up in the destination zone. If the documentation filled out by the customer says that the money is going to Detroit, Michigan, then the money should not be able to be picked up outside of the state of Michigan, no matter what information the person picking the money up has. This would help to reduce the number of scams going on because the scammers would then have to tell the victims to wire the money to Nigeria for them to be able to pick it up, and with so many people this would be a red flag because of the information about Nigerian scams.
In addition, wire transfering services could have a Fraud Alert posted in their store locations, and when anyone does fill out a wire transfer form and indicates Nigeria as the destination for the money to be picked up they could point out the Fraud Alert or have the customer sign a secondary document saying that they are aware that there are many internet scams coming out of the country of Nigeria which involve receiving a cashier’s check or money order and then wiring money.
I would like to propose laws that would require wire transfer services to implement and follow such security measures. Since we cannot go to other countries and arrest the people running these scams we must do as much as we can to provide the correct information to the American public to educate them about these scams. This means that everyone must do their part, including the wire transfering services that the scammers use as a part of their business.
Brought to you by http://www.scamvictimsunited.com/
Find us on Twitter, Facebook and more through
http://www.retaggr.com/page/ShawnMosch
Thursday, February 4, 2010
Seller Beware. Cashier's Checks Not Always As Good As Cash
http://www.gcglaw.com/resources/financial/cashiers.html
Seller Beware. Cashier's Checks Not Always As Good As Cash
January 2005
By Susan N. LeDuc, CRCM
Many of us grew up hearing "a cashier’s check is as good as cash," and it has been true for decades; a cashier’s check, which is drawn by a bank on its own funds, cannot "bounce" or be returned for insufficient funds. A cashier’s check has been and still is a trusted method to conveniently transfer sums of money that are often larger than you would want to carry or transfer in cash. A cashier’s check is also more acceptable to those on the receiving end that do not want a personal check. Unfortunately, fraudsters are very good at finding and exploiting our trust.
By betraying our trust of banks, fraudsters are passing counterfeit cashier’s checks to unsuspecting individuals and businesses and tricking people out of large sums of money. Unfortunately, the trickster is not often caught, and individuals and businesses suffer the loss. That means that all of us — individuals, business and financial institutions — must change our behavior or risk being duped by a fraudster.
Cashier's check fraud scenarios
So how does this fraud loss happen? Often, an individual or business has some asset to sell, such as a car or a piece of equipment. You advertise the item in either a newspaper or on-line, an offer is made, and a deal is struck. You agree to sell your item for $12,000 in the form of a cashier’s check. Either your buyer arrives in person or, more typically, a cashier’s check arrives via mail. You make the deal (you take the cashier’s check, the buyer takes the item), and you promptly head to the bank and deposit the check. The check is deposited and you are told it will available tomorrow. At this point, you might use the money toward some other purchase. A week later, the bank calls you to say that the cashier’s check has been returned unpaid because it is a counterfeit check. The deposit has been reversed from your account [and you may have a negative balance]. You also do not have your asset (the car or equipment). You have been defrauded — tricked out of your money.
Another variation on the scenario is that the check the buyer used to pay for the item is for more than the agreed upon price. Using the example above, say the buyer arrived with a cashier’s check for $15,000. He gives you the check and a believable story and asks for you to mail him a cashier’s check for the difference. You think the buyer must be on the up-and-up because he trusts you to return the excess! You deposit the $15,000 cashier’s check, go back the next day and buy a cashier’s check for $3,000 and mail it as instructed. A week later, the $15,000 cashier’s check is returned unpaid because it is a counterfeit, and you now have a $15,000 loss, not a $12,000 loss!
Reasons for increase in bank check fraud
The number of counterfeit cashier’s checks deposited into banks has steadily increased in recent times. Much of this increase is attributed to the increase in private sales between individuals as facilitated by the internet and online auctions.
There are also inexpensive software programs that allow someone with a computer, a scanner and a good quality printer to "create" a document which looks like a genuine check. Some counterfeits are doctored copies of genuine checks; other counterfeits are complete phonies. Even banks have trouble identifying genuine and counterfeit cashier’s checks.
The situation is further complicated by federal bank regulations. The Expedited Funds Availability Act, which is implemented by Regulation CC (12 CFR 229), provides the maximum number of days that a bank can hold a deposited check before making the funds from a deposit available (i.e., can be accessed by check or other withdrawal) to the depositing customer. This rule was developed to prevent overly long holds that banks and others placed on deposited funds.
Because of the misdeeds of a few, now all banks and financial institutions must adhere to Regulation CC. This regulation does provide for certain exceptions, but generally, a bank is required to make the funds deposited via cashier’s check, "available" on the next business day after the day of the deposit if certain conditions are met. Making the funds from a check "available" means that the funds can be conditionally accessed, but the checks are still subject to final clearing and charge-back if the item is not honored.
Regulation CC obviously reflects that historic trust that cashier’s checks are as good as cash! Unfortunately, the only way Regulation CC deals with the possibility of counterfeit cashier’s checks is in the exceptions to the availability schedules. This means that unless the bank places a longer exception hold on a deposited cashier’s check, all parties involved — the customer, the fraudster, and the Bank, all know that the funds from that deposit will be available for withdrawal by the customer long before the bank knows whether the item will be returned or not. It can take up to 7-10 days from the time a check is deposited for it to be returned to the bank as unpaid.
Don't be duped! Protect thyself
Banks that issue cashier's checks. Expect to receive calls from individuals and businesses who are payees on official checks so that the bank can confirm that such a check was issued. A bank should also be able to verify the check number, the payee, the issue date, the amount, and the authorized signer. Confirmation that a cashier’s check was issued is not a guarantee that it will be paid. However, it does eliminate many risks associated with counterfeit cashier’s checks.
Individuals and businesses accepting cashier's checks for payment. Verify that the check is genuine. Call the issuing bank (use the phone book, the bank’s website or directory assistance — do not use a telephone number printed on the check — it could be a hoax) and confirm that the item was issued. If you can’t confirm that the check was issued, consider canceling the transaction or not releasing the purchased item until the check has cleared and the funds are available and not subject to chargeback.
Banks accepting cashier's checks for deposit.
Consider offering a service to depositors to confirm (i.e., call the issuing bank) that an official check was issued. Confirmation that a cashier’s check was issued does not guarantee that the check will be paid. However, it does eliminate many risks associated with counterfeit cashier’s checks.
Publicize the existence of counterfeit cashier’s checks and how to protect against them. Consider adding a link on your website to your federal regulator’s list of counterfeit cashier’s check notices.
If the bank cannot confirm the check’s issuance, place a Reg. CC exception hold (doubting collectibility) on the deposit. Properly notify the depositor of the hold.
Consider sending the cashier’s check for collection rather than depositing it into the customer’s account directly.
Advise individuals and businesses that deposit official checks that availability is not the same as "cleared."
Train tellers and Customer Service Representatives to make a distinction between available and cleared. Do not confirm that an item is cleared unless the bank is certain that the item will not be returned.
If an official check is returned unpaid as counterfeit, the bank should submit a SAR and file it with FinCEN, police and the state banking commission.
Remember: Genuine cashier’s checks issued by a bank are as good as cash, but the counterfeit ones look like the real ones. Suspect that a cashier’s check could be counterfeit, and independently confirm its issuance before accepting it.
Thursday, January 21, 2010
Counterfeit Check Scams
The FBI continues to receive reports of counterfeit check scheme targeting U.S. law firms. As previously reported, scammers send e-mails to lawyers, claiming to be overseas and seeking legal representation to collect delinquent payments from third parties in the U.S. The law firm receives a retainer agreement, invoices reflecting the amount owed, and a check payable to the law firm. The firm is instructed to extract the retainer fee, including any other fees associated with the transaction, and wire the remaining funds to banks in Korea, China, Ireland, or Canada. By the time the check is determined to be counterfeit, the funds have already been wired overseas.
In a new twist, the fraudulent client seeking legal representation is an ex-wife "on assignment" in an Asian country, and she claims to be pursuing a collection of divorce settlement monies from her ex-husband in the U.S. The law firm agrees to represent the ex-wife, sends an e-mail to the ex-husband, and receives a "certified" check for the settlement via delivery service. The ex-wife instructs the firm to wire the funds, less the retainer fee, to an overseas bank account. When the scam is executed successfully, the law firm wires the money before discovering the check is counterfeit.
All Internet users need to be cautious when they receive unsolicited e-mails. Law firms are advised to conduct as much due diligence as possible before engaging in transactions with parties who are handling their business solely via e-mail, particularly those parties claiming to reside overseas.
Please view an additional public service announcement posted to the IC3 web site regarding a similar Asian extortion scheme located at the following link, http://www.ic3.gov/media/2009/090610.aspx. Individuals who receive information pertaining to counterfeit check schemes are encouraged to file a complaint at www.IC3.gov.
Sunday, January 3, 2010
Police warn of counterfeit checks
SAGINAW TOWNSHIP -- It’s the season for holiday cheer and unfortunately holiday scammers stealing money from consumers by using fake checks.
"This kind of stuff increases when people are…busy,” said Lieutenant Grauf. “They think [it's an] influx of money right before Christmas."
Saginaw Township police say scammers are finding new ways to steal your money and they're doing it through your mailbox.
Scammers send the counterfeit checks right to your home, and then ask you to send a small payment in return.
"Were talking about hundreds of thousands of dollars in counterfeit checks that are sweeping probably across the entire tri-city area," said Mr. Grauf.
He is a professional at spotting scams but says there are things you can do to detect a counterfeit.
First before you cash a check that you get in the mail, check the company's web-site to make sure it is legit.
Secondly real money grams always have a 1-800 number on the back so try calling the number if you have any doubts.
Finally talk to an expert if you have any questions. “Take it to your bank and have the bank put a 30 day hold on it,” said Grauf. “That will give the check time to clear."
It takes only a few minutes to cash in on what you may think to be free cash, but if it's too good to be true, it probably is.
"There are no free checks and if you did not play the Canadian lottery, you're certainly not going to get a check in the mail saying you've won it," Grauf said.
Police are also warning about another holiday scam.
Authorities say people are posing as mystery shopping companies and taking consumer’s money.
In the case of scams victims are always held accountable and could end up paying thousands of dollars in banks fees.
So it's important to research the company before giving any money.
Thursday, December 31, 2009
Scam fighting - 2010
One of the ways that we plan to do this is with events called Scam Jam. These events are the brainchild of Chuck Whitlock an investigative reporter, author and speaker. If you have ever been to a Home and Garden Show or Wedding Expo, imagine that same experience and setting focusing on scams and fraud. There are presentations, workshops and speakers on various topics such as
ID Theft
Internet Scams
Investment Fraud
Health Care Scams
Bank Fraud
Elder Fraud
Charity Scams
Mortgage Fraud
Phishing Scams
Credit Card and Check Schemes
Contractor Fraud
Food/Supplement Fraud
Mail Fraud
Presenters include local media personalities sharing their best investigative reporting stories that expose scams, law enforcement groups, lawyers and legal experts, and even former scam victims sharing their story of victimization to recovery. Beyond the workshops and presentations, people attending a Scam Jam can interact with Consumer Protection groups in the Exhibitors Room. These professionals can assist them with their scam and fraud related questions, and offer then resources to assist them recovery efforts. You may even be able to purchase one of Chuck Whitlock’s investigative books that exposes scams or books written by other presenters.
Scam Jam is a one stop shop for education and resources on scams, fraud and consumer protection.
We are currently scheduling dates for Scam Jam events for 2010. If your school, business or company would like to host a Scam Jam at your facility, or if you are a professional in the area of scam fighting and consumer protection that would like to be a part of a Scam Jam in your area, please contact us.
Shawn Mosch
Co-Founder of ScamVictimsUnited.com
There is strength in numbers!
Find us on Twitter, Facebook and more through
http://www.retaggr.com/page/ShawnMosch
Support Scam Victims United by shopping at
http://shopittous.blogspot.com/
Wednesday, December 23, 2009
Cashier's Check Survey
If you deposited a cashier's check into your bank account, at what point would you feel safe that the check is legitimate, and that you can use the funds from it with no financial risk to yourself?
(scroll to bottom of page to vote)
Answers will be posted in the following days so that you can check back and see if you are correct.
Sunday, December 20, 2009
Detecting counterfeit checks
Automatic systems for signature verification can successfully rely on a shared image archive and improve customer service and satisfaction by enabling banks and retailers to proactively inform customers of potential fraud. Similarly, check stock verification software can be used in a shared image archive environment to protect financial institutions against the fastest-growing source of fraudulent activity surrounding checks today, responsible for 28 percent of all check-related losses in banks - counterfeit checks.
The American Bankers Association reports that attempted check fraud in banks nationwide surpassed $4.3 billion in 2002, and continues to be a major concern as criminals gain access to more sophisticated equipment and develop new tactics to attack institutions with weak defenses. This newest addition to Parascript’s anti-fraud product suite will help banks and financial institutions automatically detect suspect checks passing through the system. The full suite of products will address altered and counterfeit checks as well as random and skilled forgery.
“Parascript is committed to applying our advanced pattern recognition technology to all facets of the growing problem of check fraud,” said Mike Fenton, Parascript’s vice president of Total Recognition Solutions. “First with CheckPlus® andSignatureXpert®, and now with CheckStockXpert, Parascript is setting the pace for enhancing and streamlining fraud detection. As we have in the past, we will continue to advance our technology to combat any and all fraudulent activity against financial institutions, retailers and their customers.”
CheckStockXpert uses advanced pattern recognition to verify the full image of a check as well as preprinted objects on a check including headers of check number, date, payee, dollar amount, dollar sign, memo, payor block and payor bank field. This software scrutinizes the placement of each item and its relative distances between pairs of blocks, allowing banks to immediately identify even the slightest variations of a check. Multiplemethods of verification—including quantitative analysis, pattern recognition, analytical and geometrical analysis and neural networks—further increase accuracy. Asa result, banks and financial institutions can automatically detect copies or imitations of checks passing through the system.
Parascript’s three-pronged defense puts a stop to even the most sophisticated check-writing criminals.
CheckPlus, Parascript’s hallmark check recognition software, already used by leading financial institutions captures multiple fields on a check, including payee line, check number, dollar amount and date. Having this key information helps enhance positive pay or other fraud detection applications. Parascript’s signature verification software, SignatureXpert, uses the most advanced pattern recognition technology to detect random and skilled signature forgery. These two software products combined with CheckStockXpert help banks and financial institutions build a solid defense against all types of fraud.
Parascript’s suite of anti-fraud products is immediately available. More information is available at www.parascript.com.
About Parascript, LLC
Parascript’s Total Recognition® technology converts paper-based information into computer-usable data. It is the first complete technology that recognizes all character types — cursive, handprint and machine print — on all forms. Its unique capabilities allow organizations using forms to capture customer information to dramatically reduce their data entry expenses. With Total Recognition technology, companies can turn handwritten and print data, including legacy data, into electronic information that can be used to power web-based offerings and other marketing initiatives. Total Recognition technology is available via a number of channels: as software development kits, through Parascript’s on-line services, through onsite custom solutions, and from Parascript’s partners.
Saturday, December 19, 2009
Great article on counterfeit cashier's checks
This article was originally published by MSN Money, on Friday, Dec. 11, 2009.
Did you get conned into joining a check-cashing scam? Even if authorities decide you're an innocent victim, you could find yourself owing a bank thousands of dollars.
By Katherine Reynolds Lewis
Cash a check, go to jail. Or at the very least, empty your own savings account and ruin your credit.
It's happened to hundreds of thousands of Americans who believed that banks don't make funds available unless the checks they've deposited are genuine.
It happened to Calvin Barnett, who could face 11 years in prison for doing what he said he thought was his work-at-home job.
As unemployment reaches its worst levels in generations, scammers are finding a growing pool of victims all too willing to deposit strangers' checks, then return part of the money by wire transfers.
"There's a knowledge gap that these scammers are clearly taking advantage of," said Susan Grant, the director of consumer protection for the Consumer Federation of America. "Under federal law here in the U.S., financial institutions have to give consumers access to the money from checks and money orders they deposit pretty quickly, usually within one to five business days. It can take much longer for counterfeits to be discovered, by which time the consumer has already sent the money."
"The problem is the con men are very persuasive," said Nessa Feddis, a vice president and senior counsel at the American Bankers Association, which is working with the Consumer Federation to educate consumers about check fraud. "People are desperate. They want to work. They want a job."
How the scams operate
Fake-check scams lurk under a number of disguises, but they share a common framework that depends on:
- A U.S. law that requires banks to make funds available to depositors in five business days or less -- more quickly than the bank typically can verify the check is genuine.
- Willing victims.
A fake check -- often drawn on a real account but printed in some scammer's basement -- may arrive as part of a work-at-home job offer or a sales transaction that feels like the answer to a desperate prayer. The scam artist will instruct you to cash the check, keep a percentage and wire the balance to a designated account.
A Consumer Federation study found that 1.3 million Americans have fallen for fake-check scams, losing an average of $3,000 to $4,000 per victim. Fake-check scams are the No. 1 fraud reported to the National Consumers League. The American Bankers Association estimates that bank losses from counterfeit checks totaled $307 million in 2008, up from $252 million in 2006. More than half of the banks surveyed this year expect losses due to phony checks to rise in the next 12 months, Feddis said.
Why you're on the hook
When the counterfeit is discovered, you -- the person who deposited it -- are responsible for paying back the money. After all, the bank gave you the cash, and you chose to wire it to the scam artists. It's illegal for the bank to deny you access to the funds, even if a teller suspects the check may be phony.
"It's a balance between giving people access to their money and preventing fraud," Feddis said. "The consumer is in the best position to know that they should be suspicious. . . . The bottom line is, why are they asking you to wire money when they're sending you a check?"
In the Consumer Federation survey, 59% of people wrongly believed that the financial institution confirms a check is good before allowing you access to the money.
The most common consequences
If you fall for a check-fraud scam, when the bank discovers the counterfeit checks it will deduct that amount from your account or freeze your account if there aren't sufficient funds.
That's what happened to Harry Smith, 25, of Union City, N.J. Smith answered a Craigslist ad for a paper company purportedly based in England that claimed to need a U.S.-based worker to expedite order processing. He cashed three checks totaling $6,000, kept 10% and wired the balance to the "production managers."
"I figured if whatever check I did have wasn't good, it wouldn't go through at the bank," Smith said. "I had constant communication with this other person, so I felt there wasn't anything wrong."
But when he called the return phone number on the FedEx package containing the checks, the person who answered had no knowledge of Smith's supposed employer. He went to the bank and had to wait more than a week to confirm they were counterfeits. If he didn't repay the bank the $6,000, he would be reported to ChexSystems and wouldn't be able to open a U.S. bank account for at least five years.
"Luckily I opened another one before it got reported," he said. Now the $6,000 has been turned over to a collection agency, and "I pay about $250 a month for two years to pay it off."
When you become a criminal
Cashing a fake check becomes a criminal act when you are aware of the counterfeit. Typically, banks won't press charges unless it's clear you knew about the scam, Feddis said.
But just because you know you're innocent doesn't mean that law enforcement will see it the same way.
Earl Walls of Huntington, W.Va., 68, had never been in trouble with the law before he deposited phony checks and wired $3,000 to scam artists. After his arrest, the bank froze his account; he couldn't even pay a retainer to a lawyer. According to county rules, his income from Social Security was high enough that he didn't qualify for a public defender, but the bank wouldn't let him withdraw from his account.
"I had no money," said Walls, retired from a job as a supervisor in a corrugated-box factory. "I had to get out and borrow money from friends and relations to make a house payment."
Fortunately, his neighbor contacted the West Virginia Attorney General's Office, which recognized that Walls was a victim rather than a criminal, said Derek Walker, the chief investigator for the attorney general.
"He received instructions from this 'employer,' and he followed the instructions to the letter," Walker said. "His story checked out."
After state officials talked to the county prosecutors, Walls received a pro bono public defender, and all charges were dropped. But to this day he feels anxious when he sees a police car or even a FedEx truck -- like the one that brought the counterfeit checks to his door -- in his neighborhood.
Innocent or guilty?
Calvin Barnett wasn't as lucky. For two years he's been awaiting trial for cashing a $3,000 counterfeit check he received after answering a Craigslist ad for a payment processor job.
"I haven't told my family," said Barnett, 30, who had moved to New York City from Alabama in 2007 to seek work. "I was just embarrassed that I could be so stupid."
The police were suspicious because he received the check at a post office box and cashed it at a bank where he wasn't a customer, said his attorney, Damien Brown. A spokeswoman for the New York District Attorney's Office declined to comment on Barnett's case.
Barnett is free on bail but has had trouble finding work due to the criminal indictment against him. "My life is in abeyance," he said.
How to spot the scam
The best way to avoid being scammed is never to wire money to someone you haven't known for a long time, Walker said. Even then, confirm that the person you're sending money to actually is the relative or friend you want to help.
One West Virginia resident received an urgent call asking "Grandma" for help. She blurted out her grandson's name, and the caller said, yes, that was him. But after she wired the money, it turned out that her grandson was fine. She'd just been scammed, Walker said. (See "Beware fake grandkids calling for cash.")
Other tips include:
- Never pay money in order to claim a prize. No legitimate lottery or sweepstakes will ask you to send money in advance before receiving your winnings. If you were actually a winner, you'd pay any taxes directly to the government after getting your prize.
- Never pay for grants from foundations or the government. Genuine grants -- which mostly go to organizations -- don't charge for money and have lengthy application processes.
- Never send money to anyone who asks you to cash a check or money order, whether in connection with the sale of an item, a work-from-home job or an Internet romance.
- Never wire money to someone unless you have met him or her in person and have known each other for a long time.
To learn more about scams, contact the Consumer Federation of America, the Federal Trade Commission, Fraud.org and FakeChecks.org of the National Consumers League, Scam Victims United and Fraud Aid.
Saturday, December 12, 2009
Money order scams
Co-Founder of ScamVictimsUnited.com
There is strength in numbers!
Find us on Twitter, Facebook and more through
http://www.retaggr.com/page/ShawnMosch
Support Scam Victims United by shopping at
http://shopittous.blogspot.com/
Tuesday, December 8, 2009
Consumer Education
The FTC has a new Consumer Alert, available on its Web site at http://ftc.gov/bcp/edu/pubs/consumer/alerts/alt034.shtm, titled “Money Transfers Can Be Risky Business.” It includes useful information on how consumers can avoid telemarketing and money transfer fraud, including the following tips. Don’t wire money to:
· someone you don’t know, in the U.S. or in a foreign country;
· someone claiming to be a relative in the midst of a crisis and who wants to keep the
request for money a secret;
· someone who says a money transfer is the only form of payment that’s acceptable; or
· someone who asks you to deposit a check and send some of the money back.
Consumers interested in the process of redress administration should call 202-326-3755.
The FTC’s case was investigated with the assistance of the Toronto Strategic Partnership, Project Colt, Project Emptor, and the U.S. Postal Inspection Service. Additional assistance was provided by the Durham Regional Police Service, Ontario, Canada, and the Canadian Anti-Fraud Call Centre (PhoneBusters).
The Toronto Strategic Partnership includes the FTC, the U.S. Postal Inspection Service, Competition Bureau Canada, the Toronto Police Service Fraud Squad – Mass Marketing Section, the Ontario Provincial Police Anti-Rackets Section, the Ontario Ministry of Consumer Services, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, and the United Kingdom's Office of Fair Trading. Project Colt includes the FTC, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, Surete du Quebec, City of Montreal Police Service, Canada Border Services Agency, Competition Bureau Canada, U.S. Homeland Security, U.S. Postal Inspection Service, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Project Emptor includes the FTC, the Business Practices and Consumer Protection Authority of British Columbia, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, Competition Bureau Canada, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the U.S. Postal Inspection Service.
The Commission vote approving the complaint and proposed consent order was 3-0, with Commissioner Pamela Jones Harbour recused. The complaint and order were filed on October 19, 2009, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division.
NOTE: The Commission authorizes the filing of a complaint when it has “reason to believe” that the law has or is being violated, and it appears to the Commission that a proceeding is in the public interest. A complaint is not a finding or ruling that the defendants have actually violated the law. A stipulated court order is for settlement purposes only and does not necessarily constitute an admission by the defendants of a law violation. Stipulated orders have the force of law when signed by the judge.
Copies of the complaint and stipulated order are available from the FTC’s Web site at http://www.ftc.gov and from the FTC’s Consumer Response Center, Room 130, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580. The Federal Trade Commission works for consumers to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, and unfair business practices and to provide information to help spot, stop, and avoid them. To file a complaint in English or Spanish, visit the FTC’s online Complaint Assistant or call 1-877-FTC-HELP (1-877-382-4357). The FTC enters complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online database available to more than 1,700 civil and criminal law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad. The FTC’s Web site provides free information on a variety of consumer topics.
