Rules governing wire transfers place a larger burden on account holders than laws on credit cards or debit card . . . . {the} bank says {the victim} may not have met required security requirements on his computer system — even though he has secured wireless, firewalls, anti-virus software and other protection — and so, the bank may not be liable to pay him back.
I get really frustrated when I see things like this. Why is it that the banks can sit back and do nothing, and put all of the blame on the customer!?!?! When do the banks have to stand up and say "There are things we could have done to stop this, so we are liable also."
I get really frustrated when I see things like this. Why is it that the banks can sit back and do nothing, and put all of the blame on the customer!?!?! When do the banks have to stand up and say "There are things we could have done to stop this, so we are liable also."
No comments:
Post a Comment